DUI Arrests: What to Expect When You are Presented with a Breathalyzer Test

Being pulled over, no matter the reason, is always an unnerving experience. If you are pulled over under the suspicion of driving under the influence (DUI), it is possibly one of the most serious crimes a driver can face when it comes to breaking the law behind the wheel. The crime is severe, and the consequences can be tragic, especially when the offense could have been prevented entirely by taking a cab home or calling for help.

You Must Make a Choice

If you are an Illinois driver who has been pulled over due to suspicion of operating under the influence, one of the first things you can expect to face upon arrest is a breathalyzer test. Although you are confronted by law enforcement to submit to this test, it is up to you to refuse or submit. You have the right to make a choice. It is important to note, however, that many criminal defense attorneys encourage their clients to refuse to submit to the test, due to one major advantage: By refusing, you are preventing yourself from potentially failing it, which can ultimately help you in a court of law. It is important to consult with a qualified attorney if you refuse a breathalyzer test.

Your Driving Privileges are Impacted Immediately

When you are pulled over, the arresting officer typically begins by asking you to submit to a field sobriety test. They first ask for your license, registration, proof of insurance, and practice other standard forms of protocol. If during these steps the officer discovers probable cause to arrest you, he or she will escort you to jail.

In general, if you decide to refuse the breathalyzer test, your license will be automatically suspended for 12 months. Any second or subsequent offense will result in a three-year suspension period. Your license suspension counts separately from other applicable criminal penalties. For example, under prosecution in a court of law, you may be required to pay various fines and serve jail time.

You Need to Consult With an Attorney

The moment you are accused of driving under the influence, consulting with a professional criminal defense attorney is one of the most beneficial decisions you can make. A skilled, competent DUI attorney has the knowledge and the know-how to explain your rights and to protect your best interests. If you have been arrested for DUI, contact our Orland Park criminal defense lawyer today for a free consultation.

Sources:

Illinois Compiled Statutes

DUI Information for Adults

Cyber Drive Illinois

Frequently Asked Questions About Illinois Workers’ Compensation

Though some workplaces may present more obvious dangers than others, you can get injured in any workplace. According to the latest information from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, there were around 2,811,500 nonfatal workplace injuries in the United States in 2017. Being injured at work can be stressful, especially if you have to miss work because of your injury. Fortunately, programs such as workers’ compensation exist to help people in this situation. If you are injured on the job, you have the right to submit a claim for your medical expenses and lost wages. The workers’ compensation process can be confusing, so here are a few of the most frequently asked questions about Illinois workers’ compensation:

  1. What is Workers’ Compensation?: Workers’ compensation is a statewide system of benefits that applies to most employees in Illinois. Most employers are required to have workers’ compensation insurance in case one of its employees is injured while on the job. Those who are injured at work or experience an occupational disease are eligible to file a claim for workers’ compensation benefits.
  2. What Should I Do if I Get Hurt at Work?: The best thing to do if you are hurt while you are at work is to first get medical help if it is a life-threatening injury and then immediately notify your employer. You have up to 45 days after the incident to report your injury to your employer, but it is better to begin a record of your injury or illness as soon as possible.
  3. Will My Medical Bills Be Paid?: Yes. If you are hurt at work, your employer is required to pay for all medical care to treat your injury until you have reached maximum medical improvement. These costs can include emergency care, doctor’s visits, surgery, physical therapy, chiropractic treatment, medication, and even certain medical or prosthetic devices. If your employer and its workers’ compensation insurer do not dispute the workers’ compensation claim, they can pay the bills directly.
  4. Do I Need to Hire a Lawyer?: While it is not necessary to have an attorney after you are hurt at work, hiring a lawyer can be extremely beneficial to your case. Having a lawyer by your side can decrease the chances that your employer disputes your claim. If your employer or its workers’ compensation insurer refuses to pay your medical bills or provide you with other benefits that you have a right to, an attorney can make sure you get the treatment and compensation you deserve.

Contact a Cook County Workers’ Compensation Lawyer

The last thing you want to do while you are recovering from a workplace injury is having to fight with an uncooperative employer or insurance company. If you have been injured while on the job, you should consult with a Tinley Park, IL, workers’ compensation attorney. At the Fotopoulos Law Office, we can help you recover the compensation you deserve. Call our office today at 708-942-8400 to schedule a free consultation.

Sources:

Injuries, Illnesses, and Fatalities

Understanding the Importance of Probable Cause in DUI Defense Cases

Police officers are tasked with protecting our communities. However, as with any person of authority, laws exist to direct how and when police officers can use their power. One of these constraints involves the concept of “probable cause.” In order to pull over a motorist, a police officer must have a good reason for doing so. If you are facing charges for driving under the influence (DUI), and the officer who arrested you did not have probable cause to pull you over, your case may be dismissed.

Reasonable Suspicion of a Crime

To legally pull someone over, a police officer must have a reasonable suspicion that the person has broken the law or soon will. The term “reasonable” in this context means that most officers of average training and experience would conclude that illegal activity has occurred or is about to occur. In order for a DUI arrest to be legally warranted, it must be reinforced by probable cause. Put another way, there must be some type of evidence that justifies the belief that the driver was intoxicated.

Some of the common reasons police officers pull over motorists and make DUI arrests include:

  • Traffic violations like speeding, illegal lane changes, or reckless driving. A traffic violation of any severity gives police justification to conduct a traffic stop. Some DUI arrests occur after an officer notices warning signs of intoxication, such as the smell of alcohol on the motorist’s breath, bloodshot eyes, and slurred speech.
  • Traffic accidents. Anytime a car accident involves property damage or injuries, the police should be called. An officer may discover evidence of drunk driving while investigating an accident.
  • Poor driving. If a motorist is driving erratically, swerving, driving very slowly, or making sudden and frequent lane changes, a police officer is justified in pulling this motorist over.
  • DUI testing. If a motorist fails a field sobriety test or chemical sobriety test, they will probably be arrested for a DUI. Although motorists have the right to refuse a roadside breath alcohol test like a Breathalyzer, doing so will likely result in an arrest. Refusing a blood alcohol test after being arrested will result in the suspension of one’s driver’s license.

Illegal Stops and Driving Under the Influence Arrests

If evidence was unlawfully obtained by police or prosecutors, a criminal defendant may argue to have it suppressed. The “exclusionary rule” obliges the court to dismiss any evidence acquired after an illegal police stop – including the results of a sobriety test. In some cases involving unjustified traffic stops in which an officer did not have probable cause, the charges against the criminal defendant may be dropped entirely.

Contact an Orland Park DUI Defense Attorney Today

If you are facing DUI charges, contact an experienced Tinley Park criminal defense attorney at Fotopoulos Law Office. Call 708-942-8400 to schedule your free, confidential consultation today.

Sources:

Probable Cause

Illinois Compiled Statutes

What Does the Right to a “Speedy Trial” Mean in Illinois?

You probably know that the United States Constitution guarantees your right to a “speedy trial” if you are accused of committing a crime. The Illinois state constitution has a similar requirement. But what exactly constitutes “speedy?”

In state criminal cases, Illinois law says that a defendant who is taken into custody must be tried within 120 days. If the defendant is released on bond, he or she must be tried within 160 days after filing a written demand for a trial.

Prosecutors Cannot Engage in “Piecemeal Litigation”

Illinois also has what is known as a “compulsory joinder” rule designed to help protect a defendant’s right to a speedy trial. This means that the state must bring multiple charges arising from the same arrest or act in a single prosecution. In other words, if you are arrested and accused of two crimes, the state cannot wait for the outcome of the trial of the first charge before trying you on the second one.

For example, in a 2013 case, Chicago police arrested a defendant after a search found both marijuana and an illegal handgun. The state initially charged the defendant with only drug possession. Several months later – 175 days after the defendant demanded a trial on the drug charge, to be precise – prosecutors attempted to add several new charges related to the handgun. The Illinois Supreme Court ultimately held this violated the compulsory joinder rule and dismissed the gun charges.

More recently, a state appeals court thwarted prosecutors’ attempt to pull a similar trick in the case of a defendant charged with both illegal drug possession and counterfeiting. Here, the police found marijuana and counterfeit currency – as well as “machinery and tools” purportedly used to produce the counterfeit money – during a search of the defendant’s home. Prosecutors charged the defendant with illegal drug possession first, which resulted in a guilty plea. More than a year later, the state then moved to indict the defendant for counterfeiting.

To get around the Supreme Court’s earlier ruling, the prosecutors in this case maintained that counterfeiting “cannot count as the same act as possessing drugs” for purposes of the compulsory joinder rule. The appeals court did not buy this at all. To the contrary, the court explicitly stated the law was not “intended to reward prosecutors for piecemeal litigation that harasses a defendant, as long as the State artfully pleads offenses discovered at the same time as separate acts committed at separate times.”

Have You Been Charged With Drug Possession in Illinois?

Prosecutors often resort to legal trickery to convict a defendant. Do not let them get away with it. If you have been charged with a drug crime, you should seek immediate assistance from an experienced Orland Park criminal defense attorney. Call the Fotopoulos Law Office, today to speak with an attorney about your case.

Sources:

Illinois Compiled Statutes

The People of The State Of Illinois, Appellant

When is an Illinois Doctor Liable for Failing to get a Patient’s Informed Consent?

Medical malpractice involves more than a physician’s negligence. A doctor can be held liable if he or she fails to inform the patient about the “general nature” of a procedure and the patient is subsequently injured. Informed consent in this context includes explaining the “risks involved, the prospects of success, the prognosis if the procedure is not performed, and alternative treatments.”

Court Reinstates Malpractice Claim Over Child Injured During Delivery

Informed consent often comes up when dealing with birth injuries. There are cases where a doctor fails to properly warn an expectant mother of the risks of natural childbirth. As a result, the child may be injured during delivery and suffer lifelong consequences.

A recent Illinois appellate court decision addresses the exact issue. In this case, a now-11-year-old child was injured during natural childbirth. Specifically, the child suffered what is known as shoulder dystocia. This is where a newborn’s shoulder essentially gets stuck during delivery and requires manipulation. In some cases, dystocia causes permanent injury to the child. Sadly, that was the case here, as the child sustained a clavicle fracture and “extensive” nerve damage.

The parents filed a medical malpractice lawsuit on behalf of their child. They alleged the obstetrician who delivered the child was negligent by failing to properly inform them about the increased risk of shoulder dystocia given the child’s “increasing weight” prior to birth. The mother maintained that she would have opted for a Cesarean section had it been presented as an option.

The case proceeded to trial, but after the plaintiffs rested, the judge granted the defendant’s motion for a partial directed verdict on the issue of informed consent. The parents appealed to the Illinois Fourth District Appellate Court, which agreed with them that the directed verdict was improper. The Appellate Court returned the case for re-trial.

The defendant – and the trial court – said the parents had to offer “expert testimony” to prove that a “reasonable person” in the mother’s position “would not have opted for a vaginal birth” if that had been presented as an option. The Fourth District disagreed. While expert evidence is generally required to establish a physician’s negligence and the “causal connection” between said negligence and a victim’s injury, the Appellate Court said there was little value to an expert’s opinion as to how a “reasonable person” would react “when faced with various medical options.” Indeed, the Appellate Court said such testimony was not “relevant or admissible.”

Call an Illinois Personal Injury Lawyer Today

A birth injury is a serious matter. You and your child may face a lifetime of medical bills and special care requirements as a result of a physician’s negligence. This is why it is important to take immediate action. Call the Fotopoulos Law Office, today if you need to speak with an experienced Orland Park medical malpractice attorney who can help you and your family fight for the compensation you deserve.

Source:

Illinois Official Reports

Three Things You Should Know About Your Miranda Rights

If you have ever seen any of the various law enforcement shows on TV, you have probably at least heard of your Miranda rights. The 1966 Supreme Court case Arizona v. Miranda further enforced that a police officer is required to notify you of your constitutional rights when you have been taken into custody. The case involved a young man, Ernesto Miranda, who was a suspect for rape and kidnapping. Before police informed him that he had a right to an attorney and the right to remain silent, he confessed to the crimes. This was a landmark case in the Supreme Court that is still upheld today and affects the way all criminal cases take place now. Here are a few things you should know about your Miranda rights:

  1. Your Miranda Rights are Your Constitutional Rights: The U.S. Constitution guarantees citizens certain rights, some of which are the basis of your Miranda rights. You always have the right to remain silent, the right against self-incrimination and the right to seek legal representation. There is no situation in which you do not have the freedom to exercise your Miranda rights.
  2. The Police are Legally Required to Inform You of Your Rights: This is one of the areas that the general public is often misinformed on. Police are required to inform you of your Miranda rights, but only after you have been arrested and before you are questioned. After they read you your rights, they must also get a response from you that you have acknowledged that you were read your rights and you understand them.
  3. Any Information Gathered Before You are Read Your Rights Might be Inadmissible as Evidence: If police begin to question you prior to your arrest and you offer up information, this can be used against you if you are prosecuted. However, if you have been arrested and you were not read your rights, any information that is gathered from you will most likely be inadmissible as evidence in court. Likewise, if a police officer uses force to get information from you, this will also be inadmissible as evidence.

Contact a Tinley Park, IL, Criminal Defense Attorney Right Away

Your Miranda rights are rights that are given to you by the U.S. Constitution. If you are taken into police custody or you are questioned by police, you have the right to request legal representation from a skilled Cook County criminal defense lawyer. At the Fotopoulos Law Office, we can help you exercise your rights and provide you with the legal advice that you are entitled to. Call our office today at 708-942-8400 to schedule a free consultation.

Sources:

The Miranda Warning is Created 52 Years ago Today

Self Incrimination

Right to Remain Silent

Can the Police Handcuff You Without “Arresting” You?

Drug crime cases often begin with seemingly routine traffic stops. Illinois law enforcement officers may use a minor traffic crime, such as speeding, as a pretext to stop and search a vehicle suspected to contain evidence of illegal drug activity. While the Constitution is supposed to protect all citizens against “unreasonable” searches, in practice there are a number of loopholes that judges allow police to exploit.

Court Reinstates Drug Charge After Questionable Search

One recent Cook County drug case, which is still pending, began with an unverified “tip” from an unidentified informant. Someone allegedly informed a Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) agent in San Diego that a woman was illegally transporting drugs to Chicago. This agent then told his counterparts in Chicago.

Federal and local officials working as part of an anti-drug task force at O’Hare International Airport traced the woman, identified by the San Diego agent, to a nearby hotel. They watched the woman enter one of the hotel rooms with a black bag. A short time later, the defendant and another woman entered the room. They then exited the room with the defendant carrying the black bag.

The defendant and his associate got into a car and drove away. Law enforcement followed. Two Chicago Police Department officers, acting in concert with the task force, then stopped the car on the grounds that it was “traveling too fast for conditions.”

Police removed the defendant from the car, handcuffed him, and detained him in the back of a police car. Meanwhile, police said the defendant’s female associate consented to the search of her car. A police dog sniffed the black bag and “gave an alert for the presence of narcotics.” The police searched the bag, which contained methamphetamine, and consequently the defendant was charged with a crime.

In court, the judge threw out the case against the defendant. The judge determined the police had unlawfully arrested the defendant – handcuffing and placing him in the police car – before they had “probable cause” that he had committed a crime. In other words, the police arrested the defendant before discovering the drugs.

Unfortunately, an appeals court saw things differently. The First District Appellate Court reversed the trial court’s decision and ordered the defendant to stand trial. The First District rationalized the defendant was not actually under arrest when the police searched the bag – even though he was handcuffed and placed in a police car. Instead, the defendant was merely “detained” as part of a “valid investigatory stop.” And since the police had a “reasonable articulable suspicion that the defendant was involved in criminal narcotics activity,” and the original traffic stop was legal, that made the search acceptable. The defendant has been charged with illegal possession of methamphetamine.

An Illinois Drug Crimes Attorney Can Help

If you find yourself caught up in any type of drug case, it is essential that you speak with an experienced Orland Park criminal defense attorney as soon as possible. Contact the Fotopoulos Law Office to schedule your consultation today.

Source:

Illinois Official Reports

Common Causes of Trips, Slips, and Falls in the Workplace

Accidents happen; we all know this. Accidents at work are not uncommon occurrences, especially when it comes to slips, trips and/or falls. According to the latest statistics from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, there were around 2.8 million nonfatal workplace injuries and illnesses that were reported in 2017. Of those injuries, the second most common type of injury was slips, trips, and falls. Like any injury, the severity of injuries caused by slips, trips, and falls can range from minor, such as pulled or strained muscles, to major injuries, such as spinal cord injuries or broken bones. The key to preventing these types of injuries is identifying the causes. Here are the most common causes of trips, slips, and falls in the workplace:

Substances on the Floor

When there are wet or dry contaminants on the floor, it can cause workers to lose their footing easily. Having substances on the floor is perhaps one of the most common causes of slips and falls in the workplace. Slippery substances that pose a danger can include:

  • Dust, powder or other granules
  • Water
  • Grease
  • Soap
  • Floor wax

Poor Lighting

Though it may not seem to pose a very obvious danger, a lack of sufficient lighting can also be the cause of a trip, slip or fall in the workplace. When employees cannot adequately see where they are walking or stepping, this can mask dangers that are present on the floor. Poor lighting is typically an issue in areas such as hallways, closets, parking garages, and storage rooms.

Floor Irregularities

Irregularities in flooring or walking surfaces can pose a real threat to workers both indoors and outdoors. Trips and falls are the most common incidents that can occur because of walking surface irregularities. These irregularities can include:

  • Unanchored rugs or floor mats
  • Carpeting that is worn or loose
  • Stairs with steps that are not uniform in size
  • Unmarked changes in floor height
  • Uneven sidewalks
  • Broken tiles or wood flooring

Weather Conditions

Weather conditions can also make outdoor walking surfaces more dangerous for workers. In most areas, rain can cause almost any flooring to become slick and dangerous. In parts of the country that get cold in the winter, snow and ice can build up and cause walkways to become slippery.

Injured at Work? Contact a Joliet, IL, Workers’ Compensation Attorney

Being injured at work can be problematic for many people. Not only do you suffer from the pain or discomfort of your injury, but you may also be taking time away from work, meaning you lose out on wages. At the Fotopoulos Law Office, we understand how big of a deal it is when you are injured on the job. Our compassionate and tenacious Will County workers’ compensation lawyers can help you receive the compensation you deserve. Call our office today at 708-942-8400 to schedule a free consultation.

Sources:

Industry-level Estimates

Slip, Trip, and Fall Preventionfor Healthcare Workers

Preventing Work-related Slips, Trips and Falls

Understanding Illinois Hate Crimes and Their Consequences

In the past couple of years, law enforcement officers and legislative officials have focused more attention on hate crimes. More time, energy and resources have been put into thorough investigations of hate crimes, and laws have been made even more strict than before. In Illinois, officials do not have a tolerance for hate crimes and often punish offenders to the fullest extent of the law. Though every situation is different, a hate crime committed in Illinois is charged as a felony offense, which means you face serious consequences if you are convicted. Dealing with accusations of a hate crime can be daunting, which is why retaining counsel from a skilled Illinois criminal defense attorney is crucial.

What is Hate Crime?

In simple terms, a hate crime occurs when a person commits a crime against another person or group of people because of that group or person’s perceived race, color, religion, gender, sexual orientation or physical or mental disability. Often, the type of actions that are committed against people in a hate crime is violent in nature and can include crimes such as:

  • Assault or aggravated assault
  • Battery or aggravated battery
  • Intimidation
  • Stalking
  • Theft
  • Criminal trespassing
  • Criminal damage to property
  • Disorderly conduct
  • Harassment through electronic transmission

Illinois Sees Rise in Hate Crimes, Despite National Drop

Sadly, hate crimes are not uncommon in Illinois. In fact, Illinois saw an increase in the number of hate crimes that occurred between 2017 and 2018, while national statistics saw a slight decrease. Nationally, hate crimes dropped from 7,171 in 2017 to 7,120 in 2018. Illinois, however, saw an increase from 89 hate crimes committed in 2017 to 125 in 2018.

Consequences for a Hate Crime Conviction

You face serious penalties if you are convicted of a hate crime in Illinois. At its base, a hate crime is charged as a Class 4 felony for a first offense, meaning you face a minimum of one year and a maximum of three years in state prison and up to $25,000 in fines. A second or subsequent conviction of a hate crime will result in a Class 2 felony, meaning you face three to seven years in state prison.

A sentence of probation or conditional discharge is also possible if you are convicted of a hate crime, though there are stipulations to that type of sentence. If you receive probation or conditional discharge, you will be required to perform a minimum of 200 hours of community service and enroll in a certified educational program that is designed to educate you about the status of the victim of the hate crime and discourage you from further hate crimes.

A Knowledgeable Cook County Hate Crime Defense Lawyer Can Help

Being accused of a hate crime is a very serious situation, but being convicted of a hate crime is even more serious. If you are convicted of a hate crime in Illinois, you will then be labeled as a felon and be subject to all the penalties that come along with that. At the Fotopoulos Law Office, we understand the gravity of a hate crime accusation and will fight for your innocence. Call our skilled Tinley Park, IL, hate crime defense attorneys today at 708-942-8400 for a free initial consultation.

Sources:

Hate Crimes Rise In Illinois

(720 ILCS 5/12-7.1) (from Ch. 38, par. 12-7.1)

Incidents and Offenses

Teenage DUI: Zero Tolerance Laws in Illinois

When examining traffic offenses or crimes that can be committed while driving, a DUI is one of the most serious charges one can face. The state of Illinois has cracked down on drunk driving in recent years for both underage drivers and adult drivers. Underage DUI is a very serious crime in Illinois. Not only is an offender violating DUI laws, but they are also violating the minimum drinking age laws. Having a teenage child who gets caught drinking and driving can be a nerve-wracking experience, but understanding the laws and the consequences for breaking them can help ease some of the uncertainty.

Zero Tolerance Laws

In an effort to reduce the number of teenagers who drink and drive, Illinois has adopted zero tolerance laws for drivers under the age of 21. Under these laws, any blood alcohol content (BAC) over .00 will result in charges. A first-time offender will lose their driving privileges for three months for any BAC that is over .00. They will lose their driving privileges for six months if they refuse to take a chemical test.

A second-time offender can expect to face much more serious consequences if he or she is caught drinking and driving while under the age of 21. A second offense under the zero tolerance laws will result in the loss of driving privileges for one year for a BAC over .00 or a loss of driving privileges for two years for refusing to take a chemical test.

Other Consequences

In addition to any zero tolerance charges, underage drinking and driving can mean a minimum two-year driver’s license revocation for a first DUI conviction. A driver can be convicted of DUI if there is evidence that they were driving with a BAC of at least .08%. Offenders are not eligible for a restricted driving permit until the second year of license revocation. For offenders under the age of 21, a judge can also order them to participate in the Youthful Intoxicated Driver’s Visitation Program. All of these consequences can also come in conjunction with any charges that would apply to drivers over the age of 21.

Seek Representation From a Cook County Underage DUI Defense Attorney

DUI charges are very serious, no matter what age you are when you commit them. If you or your child are facing DUI charges, a skilled Orland Park underage DUI defense lawyer can help. At the Fotopoulos Law Office, you can have peace of mind knowing that you have an attorney who will fight vigorously for your child’s rights. Call our office today at 708-942-8400 to schedule a free consultation.

Sources:

Cyber Drive Illinois